YES, I will be the first to praise quark when/if they finally get things going correctly. I have recommended quark (since 3.x) to any/all of my colleagues for many, many years. And, as in previous versions, it does not need to be perfect. I've/we've always found areas where it could be better. Always room for improvement. And we worked hand in hand with quark in adjusting and tweaking to help them get it right, all for the benefit of us, the end user.
Right now there is SO much that really needs tweaking that I've felt that they need to put their full attention into getting it right, now. It is a major irk to many of us that they don't seem to see that. And I am worried with the impending release of version 8. It almost looks like a cosmetic upgrade. Fun. Exciting. New interface, etc. What about what does not work? I don't believe they have addressed and fixed many/any of the MAJOR issues regarding transparency that need to be delt with.
There, you see, you got me going again!
I am passionate about quark, even to the point where I feel like family. And to tell you the truth, if I had a family member going down the wrong path I would take them to the woodshed also!
Now with that said, I will, in the future, try to tone down some of the "issue complaints", and get back to trying to help other users "use" what we have been given. For that, I say, thank you for calling me out.