<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.quark.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>QuarkXPress: Color management</title><link>http://forums.quark.com/28.aspx</link><description>Discuss QuarkXPress color management functionality including DeviceN workflows</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 21119.1142)</generator><item><title>Re: QXP 7. Wow what a mess!</title><link>http://forums.quark.com/thread/74523.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:50:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cf40c9e8-e153-40ea-8d0a-e3e0708e2b1b:74523</guid><dc:creator>ampegg66</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.quark.com/thread/74523.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.quark.com/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=28&amp;PostID=74523</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m certainly no expert, but my understanding is that &amp;quot;Tint&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Shade&amp;quot; are the same thing, and neither has anything to do with transparency. Opacity, on the other hand, DOES introduce transparency, which is why I avoid using Opacity unless there&amp;#39;s a specific transparency effect I&amp;#39;m looking for. If you&amp;#39;re just wanting to lighten a color, Opacity is not how I would do it.
&lt;p&gt;
I don&amp;#39;t know why you&amp;#39;d be seeing any different effect than Quark 6 when using Shade (since there&amp;#39;s really not an effect or any color blending, just changing the lightness/darkness of a color). Are you sure you&amp;#39;re not just seeing the Quark 7 color management engine, which looks totally different from Quark 6? You could try setting your Color Manager preferences to &amp;quot;QuarkXPress Emulate Legacy&amp;quot; and see if that makes a difference.</description></item><item><title>Re: QXP 7. Wow what a mess!</title><link>http://forums.quark.com/thread/74435.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:28:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cf40c9e8-e153-40ea-8d0a-e3e0708e2b1b:74435</guid><dc:creator>brianahebert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.quark.com/thread/74435.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.quark.com/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=28&amp;PostID=74435</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Quark re-wrote it&amp;#39;s colour engine and the pantone color book has been redefined. &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>QXP 7. Wow what a mess!</title><link>http://forums.quark.com/thread/74398.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cf40c9e8-e153-40ea-8d0a-e3e0708e2b1b:74398</guid><dc:creator>Baddog</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.quark.com/thread/74398.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.quark.com/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=28&amp;PostID=74398</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, we have recently had the whole network (20 users) upgraded to Q7 after waiting eagerly for around 6 months. Great I thought, now we can get on with things, but here come the problems...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We have noticed a problem (1 of many and we&amp;#39;re only 2 weeks in) which is really worrying...when we open a legacy file with a colour tint applied in 6, the &amp;#39;new&amp;#39; pallette changes the tint to a &amp;#39;shade&amp;#39; of the colour which gives us a totally different effect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fix: Change the &amp;#39;shade&amp;#39; to 100% and drop the &amp;#39;opacity&amp;#39; to the same value as the original &amp;#39;tint (Q6).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a complete nightmare as there is no way of globally changing the document without having style sheeted the whole document in Q6.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have been a loyal supporter since the late 80&amp;#39;s but am losing the faith real quick as each time this happens, people ask the question...why upgrade and who suggested it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>